Angular Icon Get 73% off the Angular Master bundle

See the bundle then add to cart and your discount is applied.

0 days
00 hours
00 mins
00 secs

Write AngularJS like a pro. Angularjs Icon

Follow the ultimate AngularJS roadmap.

Using Controller $filters to prevent $digest performance issues

Filters in Angular massively contribute to slow performance, so let’s adopt a sensible way of doing things, which may take you an additional ten minute to code, but will dramatically enhance your application’s performance.

Let’s look at how removing filters in the DOM actually impacts our $digest cycles.

What’s a DOM filter?

A DOM filter is where we use a | pipe inside an expression to filter data:

<p>{{ foo | uppercase }}</p>

This might output a String 'todd' as 'TODD' as we’ve used the | uppercase filter. If you’re not well versed with filters, check out my article on custom Filters.

Why are DOM filters bad?

They’re easy to use, which means they probably have some internal performance overhead. And that’s true, filters in the DOM are slower than running filters in JavaScript, however the main concern here is how often DOM filters get run.

Take this example, it uses a DOM filter on an ng-repeat, type some letters to see how it filters:

This looks great, and has no immediate performance concerns, no page lag or input delay. However let’s dig a little deeper.

Filter $digest evaluation

For us Angular developers, DOM filters are branded as the “awesomeness” that ships with the core, and by all means, this is tremendous, but there’s actually very little about the performance impacts of filters.

Are you ready to realise how your $$watchers are being choked by using DOM filters? Okay here goes.

Let’s setup a basic test filter:

function testFilter() {
  var filterCount = 0;
  return function (values) {
    return (value) {
      // don't do this, this is just a hack to inject
      // the filter count into the DOM
      // without forcing another $digest
      document.querySelector('.filterCount').innerHTML = (
        'Filter count: ' + filterCount
      return value;

  .module('app', [])
  .filter('testFilter', testFilter);

This majestic testFilter will be bound to an ng-repeat, and each time the filter is called, it’ll increment its internal counter and log it out in the console for us.

Angular Directives In-Depth eBook Cover

Free eBook

Directives, simple right? Wrong! On the outside they look simple, but even skilled Angular devs haven’t grasped every concept in this eBook.

  • Green Tick Icon Observables and Async Pipe
  • Green Tick Icon Identity Checking and Performance
  • Green Tick Icon Web Components <ng-template> syntax
  • Green Tick Icon <ng-container> and Observable Composition
  • Green Tick Icon Advanced Rendering Patterns
  • Green Tick Icon Setters and Getters for Styles and Class Bindings

We can add it to the ng-repeat like so:

    {{ }}

Let’s also add some data to a Controller and force a $digest every ~1000ms to see how quickly these filters start stacking up.

function UserCtrl($interval) {

  var users = [{
    name: 'Todd Motto'
    name: 'Ryan Clark'
    name: 'James Ryddyk'
    name: 'Jurgen Van de Moere'
    name: 'Jilles Soeters'

  // force a $digest every ~1000ms
  $interval(function () {}, 1000);

  this.filteredUsers = users;


And the output (note the “Filter count: X” text in the code embed). Please note, the <input ng-model=""> functionality no longer exists however has an ng-model attribute bound, this is merely just to show filter evaluations inside the $digest loop.

Boom boom boom. Five filter calls every $digest loop. This can’t be very efficient right? Especially with an ng-repeat with 1000 items inside. Think about it.

What’s more, typing something inside the <input ng-model=""> runs a $digest and numbers soar into double and triple figures. By the time you’ve read down to this stage the figure is probably into the hundreds, if not thousands.

Why are our filters running when we’re not even filtering the ng-repeat with the ng-model anymore?

The filters here are run every single $digest.

$filter in Controller

We almost certainly don’t want the desired behaviour above, which if you’ve got large collections inside an ng-repeat and DOM filters, this is going to grind your application’s performance to a halt very quickly.

Let’s look at implementing a filter in the Controller using $filter.

function UserCtrl($filter, $interval) {

  var users = [...];

  // force a $digest every ~1000ms
  $interval(function () {}, 1000);

  // updateUsers will call `testFilter` ourselves
  this.updateUsers = function (username) {
    this.filteredUsers = $filter('testFilter')(users);

  this.filteredUsers = users;


And bind the this.updateUsers method to the <input ng-model=""> as an ng-change event:

  placeholder="Type to filter" 

Yes, we’re still forcing a $digest every ~1000ms in this example. Let’s observe the output and see when our ng-repeat filter gets called…

Answer: no filters are run until you type, rather than every $digest. We’re making serious progress. Our filter is only called when we activate it through the this.updateUsers function, it’s not cycled through each $digest.

Okay that’s great, but how can I run my filter so it’ll work?

Currently the this.updateUsers method takes an argument (username), we can pass this into Angular’s generic (and so wonderfully named) filter filter:

this.updateUsers = function (username) {
  this.filteredUsers = $filter('filter')(users, username);

And that’s all we need. Now we have a $filter that is actually only called when we need to filter, rather than having the filter function run every single $digest loop. This will significantly reduce the $digest overhead when not filtering, and run filters when actually necessary.

“Chaining filters”

Yes, chaining filters is great, but their order of declaration affects the output of the filtered collection, and two, you’re going to make the above $digest filter issues even worse.

How can I chain filters inside a Controller?

Easy, it’s not essentially chaining, filters are just function calls. Filter your first collection, and pass the filtered collection off to another filter, then assign that finalised collection to the public property:

this.updateUsers = function (username) {
  var filtered = $filter('filter')(users, username);
  filtered = $filter('orderBy')(filtered, 'name');
  this.filteredUsers = filtered;

With this example, I can use ng-init="user.updateUsers(username);" to instantly show you how this works:

The filter runs $filter('filter')(users, username) followed by $filter('orderBy')(filtered, 'name');. Which passes in var filtered... as a variable. Essentially it’s doing this inside itself, passing a filter into a filter:

this.updateUsers = function (username) {
  this.filteredUsers = $filter('orderBy')($filter('filter')(users, username), 'name');

Filters in Controllers: do it.

Learn Angular the right way.

The most complete guide to learning Angular ever built.
Trusted by 82,951 students.

Todd Motto

with Todd Motto

Google Developer Expert icon Google Developer Expert

Related blogs 🚀

Free eBooks:

Angular Directives In-Depth eBook Cover

JavaScript Array Methods eBook Cover

NestJS Build a RESTful CRUD API eBook Cover